跳至主要内容

Ling Shan Hermit:Do you genuinely harbor a sense of reverence?

We are all seasoned practitioners of self-deception, each of us living within self-spun illusions. We tend to think highly of ourselves, believing we possess all the qualities required of a good spiritual practitioner. For instance, when the topic of reverence arises, it’s rare to encounter someone who considers themselves lacking in this aspect. Many people readily admit that they lack time, fortune, or opportunities to be alone with their mentor, but seldom do they identify a deficiency in their reverence. I presume this might be because reverence can be simulated. If we were to judge based on external behavior alone, they appear to possess it indeed, able to perform an entire set of actions that suggest reverence. However, at times, I find myself questioning whether what they display is genuine reverence or simply a manifestation of snobbery. Having observed many individuals over an extended period, I’m more prone to believe that what most people carry within them leans towards the latter.

True reverence stems from the understanding of the concept of emptiness and the recognition of the spiritual mentor as the embodiment of Buddha. The more profound your understanding of emptiness and your spiritual mentor, the deeper your reverence becomes. Unfortunately, most people fail to comprehend either emptiness or their mentor. Their reverence is constructed solely upon mundane matters.

If we could traverse through time and space, I would love to send those who claim to have devotion to Naropa, Milarepa, and the Sixth Patriarch Huineng, who was still hiding among hunters before his emergence. I would like to see what would happen. Based on their usual behavior, I don’t think they would have the ability to recognize these figures as great saints who would have extraordinarily vast accomplishments in the future. I don’t believe they would prostrate themselves at the feet of these masters. Instead, they are more likely to treat these masters with scorn and derision. And why not? Naropa appears no different from the person picking up soda cans in your neighborhood, while Milarepa resembles a vagrant, and the Sixth Patriarch has not a single disciple by his side. How could those who value titles and official recognition have faith in them? I’d wager they would certainly run to Shenxiu, a Zen master with a multitude of followers.

The so-called reverence that most individuals profess is largely indistinguishable from the conformist behavior that emerges in public places when they encounter someone of high status. When you witness a crowd suddenly erupting into excited screams, you might inexplicably find yourself swept up in the fervor, mirroring similar actions. Their actions are merely mimicry, driven by the sight of others behaving in the same way, not by any deep understanding or appreciation of the wisdom of the individual they’re responding to. They are swayed by the confidence displayed by the crowd around them, which leads them to presume that the person in question must be of significant stature. In a sort of self-preservation instinct, they too can’t help but display a facsimile of this confidence. The reverence of many such individuals is born this way, and this is how they unknowingly become disciples of someone. This behavior is inherently risky as it involves self-deception as well as deceiving others. I wouldn’t find it surprising if such individuals, one day, hurl eggs at their own teacher, because their commitment was never truly born out of respect for wisdom. Their discipleship is rooted in a strong herd mentality; hence, when the majority begins to act erratically, they are highly likely to follow suit.

True devotion should arise from your comprehension of and respect for a mentor’s demonstrated virtue and the awe-inspiring wisdom they embody. Reverence should not be generated simply because a teacher has amassed hundreds of thousands of followers, nor should it surface merely because of someone else’s approval of them, and it certainly should not be spurred by their possession of a grand temple or distinguished titles. Regrettably, this is precisely how the purported devotion of many individuals comes into being. Should their mentor lack the grandeur of a vast temple, a throng of disciples, esteemed titles, or a chorus of endorsements, their reverence dissipates. Thus, their so-called devotion is nothing more than a sophisticated veneer of opportunism.

I used to be perplexed by how some individuals could conjure a sense of devotion towards a teacher whom they’ve just met and about whom they know virtually nothing. Now I comprehend that it bears more resemblance to a social stratagem than genuine reverence. I’m not dismissing the existence of those who can experience an immediate surge of faith upon a first encounter, nor am I denying the presence of such enlightened beings whose spiritual accomplishments are so manifest that simply laying eyes on them can evoke faith in people. However, more often than not, what I perceive in many individuals’ so-called faith is a mere social maneuver.

译成中文:Roughly twenty years ago, I was partaking in the simple pleasure of tea at the home of an associate of mine, a spiritual teacher. As midday approached, a few of his disciples made their arrival, one of whom was a middle-aged woman with a distinct northern accent. From the moment she saw the teacher, she became a cascade of tears, fervently voicing her strong affinity with this teacher and her unwavering faith. She nearly exhausted a whole box of tissues in the process. I was teetering on the edge of being moved — if it weren’t for the fact that I encountered her again the very next day at another teacher’s place, reenacting the same emotional display to the letter.

During the second encounter, she was deep in her feelings, pouring out tales of her faith and experiences. At first, she didn’t realize my presence, but upon recognizing me from the previous day, her storytelling abruptly came to a halt. Her countenance at that moment was a spectacle in itself — eyes wide with shock, features twisted in panic, overlayed with a sheen of embarrassment, all while her mind seemed to churn rapidly seeking a way out of the predicament. Despite my lack of intention to expose her, it was evident she felt a risk of being uncovered. Consequently, she wrapped up her narrative hastily and made a swift exit. Thereafter, our paths never crossed again.

With each similar experience I’ve encountered, my emotional response to such demonstrative displays of faith has dulled. Now, I’ve come to realize these are merely social maneuverings, a show they put on for anyone and everyone. It seems there’s a vast number of individuals skilled in this type of performance, to which my only response is a resigned, indifferent shrug.

If you’re in the habit of regularly performing acts of devotion, it could prove harmful in the long run. The risk lies in convincing yourself that this performance is the embodiment of true devotion and faith. However, it’s nothing more than a manifestation of self-serving opportunism and social maneuvering, bearing no genuine correlation to sincere devotion.

Penned by Ling Shan Jushi in May 2023, and finalized on the 8th of June, 2023.

The copyright of all articles by Ling Shan Jushi in Simplified and Traditional Chinese, English, and other languages belongs to the natural person associated with “Ling Shan Jushi”. Please respect copyright laws. Any media or individuals (including but not limited to internet media, websites, personal spaces, microblogs, WeChat official accounts, print media) wishing to use these articles must first obtain authorization from Ling Shan Jushi. No modifications to the articles are allowed (including changes to the author’s name, title, main body content, and punctuation marks). We reserve all legal rights.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

灵山居士:婚姻为什么那么让人痛苦?

有人问:老师,我已经结婚十年了,婚姻为什么那么让人痛苦?   灵山居士回复:在我看来,现代婚姻制度是一种相当失败的设计,我们崇尚的爱情观念也是一样,因为那相当于你和一只猫约定了他永远不许偷吃鱼。很多人曾经结婚,后来离婚了。他们对于婚姻抱有不切实际的期待。当他们的期待落空,他们就会崩溃。我不知道现代这种通行的婚姻制度起源于何时,我知道的是,这种婚姻制度爱情观念在现代让人变得愈发自私,它会让你有很多错误的期待,我不认为在中国有男人能做到女人认为他应该做到的一切。基本上,你是在要求一只猫能够拉动一辆汽车。你对对方有很多期待,你希望对方的一切都是你的,你希望你永远是最重要的,你希望他既能挣很多钱,又能永远爱你,还要对你的家人朋友都好。对于学习佛法的人来说,如果你能学会降低你的期待,能学会如何与猫相处。你的痛苦会减少很多。 本文于 2020 年 8 月 17 日首发于灵 山居士新浪微博及谷歌 Blogger 。版权所有,侵权必究。       版权声明:所有灵山居士文章简繁体,中英文版权归 “ 灵山居士 ” 所属的自然人所有,请尊重版权,媒体或个人(包括互联网媒体,网站,个人空间,微博,微信公众号,纸媒)如需使用请先获得灵山居士授权。不得对文章进行任何修改(不得修改的范围包括:作者名,标题,正文内容,以及标点符号)。我们保留一切法律权利。    电子邮件:  lingshanjushisiwu@gmail.com   灵山居士新博客: http://blog.sina.com.cn/lingshanjushi2017   谷歌 Blogger : https://lingshanjushi.blogspot.com/   灵山居士微博: http://weibo.com/lingshanjushi   灵山居士官网: http://www.xinwuyang.com/   灵山居士公众账号: lingshanjushigz    

灵山居士:自我是这样阻碍你的进步

我们都拥有一个强大的自我,我们的自我强到足以把我们的一切自私的行为解释得看似合理(至少让我们自己相信自己的动机是无可非议的),甚至可以把它解释的非常符合佛教教理——如果你的自我足够聪明而又你精通佛教理论的话。 自我会带来包括战争在内的诸多问题,没有任何问题和自我无关。我们所有的问题都源于我们执取一个不存在的自我。若我们真正了解自我只是我们的幻觉,那我们的问题就会消失或适度减轻。 我今天并不想说太多。我只想说一下自我是如何阻碍我们的修行。他是如何阻碍我们把自己变得更好的。 我想你可能听过利美运动。那是十九世纪藏传佛教的蒋杨钦哲汪波等大师发起的运动。意谓平等的看待一切教法。在那个时代,据说很多人都不愿意去学别人的教法。很多珍贵的教法因此面临传承断裂的危险。 我在此揣度不愿学习别人教法的人。我相信多数人是因为自我太强的缘故。对于一个地位已经很高的人。向别人求法看上去似乎是很丢脸的事。他一定有这样的担忧:如果我向某人求法,我的弟子们会怎么想?他还会因为自我而觉得自己不需要任何其他教法。所以就出现了这样的情形。每个人都不愿意去学习别人的教法。严重点的还会互相否认,否认对方的教法源自佛陀。或认为自己的教法优于其他所有教法。 因为自我的缘故,我们会把法进行划分,我们会认为这些法属于我们的教派,所以它是好的。而另一些法不属于我们的教派,我们就可以漠视他。有这样想法的人似乎忘了所有的法都源于佛陀。而最初这些法并不为任何宗派所持有。法的出现远远早于宗派。 当我们说起大圆满,你会觉得那是宁玛派的法,说起时轮金刚,你会觉得那是觉囊。说起道果,很多人会觉得那是萨迦派的东西。说起禅宗,你会觉得那是汉地的法。如果你这么想那表示你犯了严重的错误。大圆满不是宁玛派,时轮金刚也不是觉囊派的法,他们都是佛法。释迦牟尼佛传授时轮金刚密法的时候,世间并没有一个叫觉囊的宗派。 自我会耽误很多事,你可能因为自我而失去得到某个珍贵传承的机会。只是因为你放不下自我的所谓面子。你认为自己非常优秀。足以教导任何人而无需任何人的教导。没有任何人可以教你东西。这是自我严重膨胀的结果。 当你这么想的时候,你会失去很多机会。你可能因为自我而把你想问的问题埋在心里。因为你不愿意被别人视为需要教导者。你的自我无法承认自己是这样的人。我这些话当然并非说给普通学佛者。对于一般学佛者来说,他...

灵山居士:回遮浅说

作为佛教徒,你们大概都听说过回遮法。在藏传佛教的系统里,我们有心经回遮法,我们还有大白伞盖佛母和狮面空行母回遮法,我知道你们中间很多人每天都修回遮。大多数人理解的回遮大概就是把某种要伤害我们的力量挡住(类似于导弹防御系统),或是让它反弹回伤害者自身。不能说这样的理解不正确。从某种意义上来说,这种理解甚至是正确的。但相对来说,回遮有更深广的涵义。 一般我们所谓的回遮,似乎都是为了保护我们自己。但我们必须格外小心,在我们修回遮的时候,我们必须问一下自己,我们为什么要保护自己?我们要保护的是什么?是我们的修行吗?还是我们非常珍视的现世生活?如果我们是希望我们的生活不被打扰,我们可以安安稳稳挣更多的钱,我们的生活不被搅乱,让一切都变得可以控制,不出任何意外 —— 那么这绝不是佛教修回遮的目的。从肤浅的层次来说,我们所有的痛苦都来源于我们希望自我证明和自我保护。如果你想用回遮来自我保护,那么就像是试图用泥巴来洗澡。请记住,佛教的任何法门都是为了摧毁自我这个幻觉而存在。回遮当然也不例外。但我们经常干的就是拿着佛法来自我证明,或是自我保护。曾经有个人问我,他每天都供养护法神,为何护法不保护他的生意?这是个很奇怪的问题。就像是你问医生为何不维护治安一样。护法神从来都不是为了保护你的轮回而存在。他的责任不是让你在轮回中过得更舒坦。时时刻刻提醒你轮回的苦才是他的义务和工作。 在回遮的法门里,我们提到三种敌人,第一种就是我们所谓的有形的敌人,也就是那些给我们制造障碍的人或是非人,非人特指那些有能力伤害我们并对我们抱有敌意的鬼神。第二种则是更深奥的敌人,这也就是我们通常所说的贪嗔痴慢疑,或是任何情绪。第三种则是更深刻的敌人,我们甚至都不知道它属于敌人,也就是我们的二取执。第一种敌人,似乎不难理解,我们习惯于把所有让我们不满意和我们有冲突的人都归类为第一种敌人。但这样做可能会有问题。你可能希望通过修回遮把所有让你不高兴的事都屏蔽掉。但是,从实修的角度来说,如果没有这些事情,我们也就无法修行 —— 就像是演员没有舞台一样。作为修行者,我们需要经历各种事情,如果我们在经历每一件或好或坏的事情的时候都能维持正见 —— 无论是我们当选美国总统,成为上市公司老板,还是成为阶下囚,被万人唾弃, —— 我们都可以保持正见,不失正见。那么我们可以说我们修的还...